News about AT&T's desire to buy T-Mobile from its German parent
company reminds us that there are many other companies struggling out
there as giants such as Google and Apple claim more control. Here's a
look at companies that need to innovate quickly to survive.
1. Palm
Formerly the king of PDA's (see 1997), Palm has made some very bold
decisions in its career as a cell phone manufacturer. Skipping Android,
Palm chose to utilize the genius mind of Matias Duarte (now a Google
employee) to create its on mobile operating system, WebOS.
Despite its brilliance, the Pre and WebOS failed to put up the right
numbers to keep Palm on its feet. Now owned by HP, Palm has basically
recreated the Pre three separates times, still claiming that it is
innovative. Palm's most recent phone, the Pre 3,
might have seen success in a June 2007 release. HP, on the other hand,
has started to utilize WebOS in its web-connected printers with much
success.
Biggest Threat: Google. With the largest growing
app store, Google is shutting WebOS out of the development world.
Without third party development support, Palm lacks the excitement of
iOS and Android that comes with gaming and utility applications.
Keys to Success: HP, Touchpad, Veer. One of the
main reasons Palm agreed to be purchased by HP was because of its
ability to reach vast markets around the world. At this point, it seems
like HP only cares about Palm for its WebOS capabilities and is
trashing the distribution promises. With the introduction of its Touchpad and Veer,
Palm has created a system for very pure interactions between devices.
The Veer, a miniature sized phone, has good appeal to those that find
the large slate phones to be too bulky. The Touchpad/Veer combination
could be a wild success if handled correctly by HP.
2. Sprint
With recent news of the AT&T-Mobile powerhouse, Sprint is
potentially facing a new threat that could throw them out of the cell
phone industry. Though the deal is not yet completed, Sprint lacks the
capital and infrastructure to be a viable competitor to Verizon and
AT&T-Mobile. While their pricing is certainly competitive, they
have steadily lost market share since before the iPhone was even
released.
The iPhone, with all its power, has made an impact on Sprint without
ever being associated with it. Where T-Mobile and Verizon had an array
of viable iPhone competitors at the time of its release, Sprint was left
gimping behind with its Palm Pre, which came out six months later. To
this day, Sprint lacks the competitive edge to kick-start sales.
Biggest threat: AT&T-Mobile. Potentially the
largest cell phone provider in the country, AT&T-Mobile would have
an extensive 4G network that would dominate Sprint's. With Verizon at
its side, the two could easily oust Sprint from the market by beating
prices, signing exclusivity contracts with hot phones, and having better
service.
Key to success: FCC. If the AT&T-Mobile merger
does not clear the FCC, Sprint not only has its competition back, but
also a chance to purchased T-Mobile itself, which would put them right
in the running with AT&T and Verizon.
3. Motorola
Similar to Palm, Motorola has seen a steady decline in market share
since the year of the RAZR. That year, 2004, was the most recent year
that Motorola was at the top of its tech game. Since then, it has
released many plastic-y and junky feeling phones, and half-heartedly
embraced Android. MotoBlur is Motorola's skin on Android, which is
widely agreed to actually hurt the software instead of helping it (see
HTC Sense). Right now, Motorola is embarking on a new journey through
its Atrix.
As the first legitimate dual-core phone on the market, the Atrix can
fully run a very thin laptop which happens to be its primary accessory.
Biggest Threat: Apple. With so much riding on the new Xoom
tablet, Motorola has to recognize the possibility of their tablet
simply failing as so many others have. The last company to lay it all
on the line with a tablet was Samsung with the Galaxy Tab.
Unsurprisingly, Samsung simply couldn't compete with Apple's utter
dominance of the tablet market. With the Xoom's price sitting even
higher than the iPad, Motorola is going to see some big struggles finding a customer base.
Keys to Success: Xoom, Atrix. Another child of Google's Duarte, 3.0 Honeycomb
stands to bring Android up the ladder to Apple. Yet because the Xoom
is the only 3.0 device on the market, Android's growth is holding up a
bit until the source code is released to developers and manufacturers.
The Atrix is an interesting idea, but poorly executed plan. The cell
phone industry in the United States is based off of the appeal of
inexpensive and heavily subsidized phones. With its laptop partner
coming in at $499 on top of the phone price and a two-year contract, a
regular laptop seems to be a more obvious choice.
4. Sony Ericsson
Here's a company that you probably haven't heard much about other
than their recent logo dispute with Clear. Once a Nokia competitor in
the low-end market, SE didn't even care to compete with the smartphone
guys until its Xperia X1
in late 2008. It was plagued not only by a series of delays, but also
by the horribly laggy and unintuitive Windows Mobile software.
For the next three years, SE rode the late train to Smartphone School until it announced the Xperia Play
last month. Dubbed the PlayStation Phone in the tech world, the Xperia
Play combines a mid-tier Android phone with the brilliance of
PlayStation One. Original PlayStation games will be available on the
market.
Biggest Threat: Apple. With the largest app store
in the world, Apple has more than 350,000 apps for distribution.
PlayStation One, on the other hand, has only 2,400, not all of which
will be available.
Key to Success: Xperia Play. This phone is so
specific to the gaming world that it could easily be a hot device both
domestically and internationally. There is some nostalgia associated
with the device, seeing as it will run some of the greatest classics of
the gaming world. If SE can stop skimping on device materials, it can
hit a real home run with the Xperia Play.
5. Blackberry
If you've purchased a Blackberry lately, you probably have noticed
that it’s basically the exact same device as someone that purchased on
four years ago. With such a successful business device, Blackberry has
basically dominated the enterprise device world for years. Corporations
around the world are happy to hand out Blackberries to their employees
because they simply make a business more productive.
Yet while Blackberry has stuck with its same form factor and software
for the last 5 years, other companies developing for enterprise are
slowly starting to enter the market and knock off Blackberry. In the
consumer world, Blackberry has struggled greatly to innovate. While
teenage girls love texting on a physical keyboard, the touchscreen slate
is becoming ever more fashionable, thus making the Blackberry simply
look bland.
With its first touchscreen phone, the Storm,
Blackberry realized how out of date they really are. Sales were
morbid, just as they were with the Torch and Storm 2. Unless Blackberry
can jump back into the market with a new exciting innovation, they are
on track to be pushed out of both the consumer and enterprise markets.
Biggest Threat: Apple. For the first time since
2007, companies are starting to hand out iPhones as their business
phones for employees. Since this is the area where Blackberry really
shines, it could take a huge hit if this trend expands. Where Apple
recreates its form factor every two years, it’s been about four since
Blackberry has.
Keys to Success: Engineering, Playbook. If everything goes according to plan, the new Playbook
tablet would hit the market as the first enterprise tablet. There is
no denying Blackberry’s success in this market, and having taken some UI
hints from Android (a lot, actually) the Playbook is one of the most
anticipated devices of the year. Though the iPad still does dominante
the tablet market, the enterprise tablet market is basically untouched
as of now. With a release date of April 16th, Blackberry could soon be
the new tablet that we can’t live without.
No comments:
Post a Comment